Lauren wrote: In your experience, were the exam questions and answer choices written more clearly? Were they as vague as SH?
That's a difficult one to answer because I don't know that my own experience of and recollections from the exam are worth building expectations on. It has been many months, so my memories are dulled. I certainly cannot recall any specific questions or their details anymore. (Not that I'd repeat any on this Forum or elsewhere if I did.)
I will say that I did find the exam questions and answer options, overall, to be more vague than what we encounter in PM Prepcast quizzes and practice exams. When using PM Prepcast, I had become accustomed to being able to quickly identify the correct answer with confidence very often. That is thanks to how well-crafted those questions are, and also how much textual information is provided in the questions and/or answers. In my PMP exam session, that wasn't the case.
It seems to me that the vagueness of PMI content, be it in Study Hall or the actual exam, is down to a) the relative sparseness of the wording, which provides little context, and b) the crafting of the sentences themselves. I know that I appear heavily critical of PMI in that respect, but I do believe that there's a real problem in how the organization goes about producing the questions, since I encountered several cases in both SH and the exam of the wording being simply wrong, syntactically or grammatically. This cannot be explained by regional differences in English (e.g. US, UK, SA, etc.), which I'm used to working with. Instead, they are straight-up errors that render the questions far less clear than they should be.
It's annoying for this to occur in a high-pressure exam that costs a large amount of money to have the privilege to sit. But unless PMI have gone over the bank of possible questions recently and done some proofreading/correcting, this may well still be occurring, so you just have to be prepared for it.
The bottom line is that despite feeling a lot less at ease during the exam, I was relieved to receive a very positive result. I thank the thorough and enjoyable preparation done through using the PM Prepcast quizzes and practice exams for that (no affiliation whatsoever). While that likely won't feel encouraging to someone before their exam, I don't think there's any way around it. Go in being prepared for 'vague' or even language errors and you'll be less surprised.
Maybe the people who promote the use of SH have a different experience of it, or have it as their sole means of doing quizzes and practice exams. In the absence of PM Prepcast, and with plenty of time to work through all its content, I can see SH being better than nothing, but I still find it poorly conceived and certainly not a good platform for active learning/testing.
Trust in your abilities and all the best with your continuing preparation!