Do you need customer support or technical assistance? Click here to submit a support ticket...

TOPIC: Early Start Convention - Forward Pass

Early Start Convention - Forward Pass 1 year 10 months ago #18200

  • Paolo Santinelli
  • Paolo Santinelli's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Posts: 3
  • Thank you received: 0
Dear PM Prepcast Team,

I would like to ask you a clarification about the convention to use for calculating the Early Start and which is the one to be used during the PMP Exam.
Once we have defined the network diagram, we can calculate the Critical Path, I have no doubt on this. Once the Critical Path has been identified, we can move forward with the Forward Pass.
However, during my practice, I have found out that it is possible to use two conventions for the Early Start of the first activity on the Critical Path.
The first activity on the Critical Path has as predecessor only the start, which has duration 0. Therefore, the question is:

- The Early Start of the first activity is 1 (referring to a generic unit of time)
- The Early Start of the first activity is 0

I would like to be sure to use the right convention for the PMP exam.
Thank you for your answer.
Paolo Santinelli

Early Start Convention - Forward Pass 1 year 10 months ago #18201

  • Cornelius Fichtner
  • Cornelius Fichtner's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • President, OSP International LLC
  • Posts: 1850
  • Karma: 96
  • Thank you received: 434

This question has been asked here in the forum many times (Last one was only 3 days ago...) Here is once again my standard answer, copied from our PMP Exam Formula Study Guide, which you can find at www.pmformulas.com :

There are two approaches for calculating ES, EF, LS and LF:

• First approach: You calculate the network diagram starting on day 0
• Second approach: You calculate the network diagram starting on day 1

In the PMP Exam Formula Study Guide we use the second approach, because when your sponsor tells you that your project starts on the first day of September, then that is September 1, not September 0. This is also the way that all modern scheduling tools seem to work. You schedule your project based on a calendar start date and not "on day 0".

That is why there is a slight difference between the calculations: you have to add/subtract 1 from the results in the second approach.
Of course, this often leads to confusion for PMP exam students and they ask which formula should we use on the exam?

We have discussed this with a number of PMP trainer colleagues and they agree that PMI does not "support" a specific method of calculating a network diagram. (Remember that next to the two options shown above you could also calculate a network path starting on a specific calendar date in hours instead of days, making the calculations even more complex).

Neelesh Pandey, PMP (a PMP trainer) has told us the following about his teaching experience with these formulas:

I use a PowerPoint presentation with animations to prove that no matter what method you follow, the result is same. I choose a part of a network diagram with four sequential activities, which sum up to a duration of 10. This path has a float of two based which we calculate LS and LF. My participants once assured that it doesn't make a difference tend to use the "zero" method. Somehow they find it simple as no subtraction is needed. PPT animation helps me a lot and also I ask my participants to calculate ES, LS, EF, and LF for a simple network diagram using both the methods.

As you see, both of these calculations will lead to the correct answer. However, in the exam the big difference is that the first approach (starting on day 0) involves fewer calculations because you don't have to "+1 or -1" each time. So, in order to reduce your "risk" of doing a calculation wrong and saving time during the exam, you might want to initiate the network diagram with day 0. However, in "real life" starting with day 1 is more appropriate.

Since PMI is aware of these varying methods, you should not see a question on the exam where only the application of one or the other leads to the correct answer.
Until Next Time,
Cornelius Fichtner, PMP, CSM
President, OSP International LLC
Moderators: Yolanda MabutasMary Kathrine PaduaGabriella Dellino, PMPJoe PangJohn Paul BugarinEmily Rivera, PMPLisa Sweeney PMPHarry ElstonMani SelvanDenver MartinEric Wanyutu Kahiga, PMP, PMI-ACPSarah FucciThiago França, PMP®Felix Kamanga, PMPChan RampersaudElena MekhanoshinaKyle Kilbride, PMP

Training for Project Management Professional (PMP)®, PMI Agile Certified Practitioner (PMI-ACP)®, and Certified Associate in Project Management (CAPM)®