Hey Kenneth,
You’re definitely not alone here – many candidates find that just books and question banks don’t “stick” without interaction. It’s not about how much you read, but how you process it.
What I’ve seen working well:
Study groups or accountability partners – sharing perspectives helps you connect the dots.
Coaching/mentoring – sometimes just having someone practically explain concepts makes all the difference.
Video breakdowns & simulations – they turn abstract concepts into something you can actually see in action.
In my work as a PMP/PgMP Coach, I’ve supported many candidates who felt the same way. Once we switched to interactive sessions and scenario-based learning,
their confidence (and exam performance) went way up.
So yes – explore what engages you. The “right” method is the one that keeps you learning consistently.
For example, I often recommend a mix of exam simulator debriefs, structured study groups, and scenario-based coaching.
That way, you combine interaction and structure, which turns passive reading into active learning.
BR,
Markus