Dot voting is a quick, democratic way to prioritize features or tasks based on team consensus. While it’s helpful for making decisions quickly and gauging interest or preference, it doesn't always reflect the actual value flow or efficiency of the system like Value Stream Analysis does.

Dot voting is more subjective, based on team members’ opinions and the immediate importance of tasks, whereas Value Stream Analysis provides an objective, process-driven view of where focus should go based on value delivery and efficiency.

please guide in more detail why value stream analysis which is more focused on process is considered as prioritization technique in place of Dot voting?

Sameer Menda wrote: Here is our free PMI-ACP Exam sample question of the week.

Question 133: You are coaching your Agile team in different ways to prioritize value. Which one of the following would not be a way to prioritize?
A. Dot voting
B. Value stream analysis
C. MoSCoW
D. Monopoly Money

Correct Answer to Q#143: A

A risk burn down chart will show the progression of mitigation efforts. If the project is going well, the chart will trend down.

Here is our free PMI-ACP Exam sample question of the week.

Question 143: A key stakeholder is asking what the overall risk situation is for the iteration. Which of the following will you show them to help answer that question?
A. Risk burn down chart
B. Burn up chart
C. Burn down chart
D. Velocity tracking charts

Correct Answer to Q#142: D

Course-grained requirements are broken down to fine-grained requirements once more information is discovered, not the other way around.

Here is our free PMI-ACP Exam sample question of the week.

Question 142: Utilizing decision delays in an Agile environment allows teams to do all of the following except __________ .
A. Mitigate risks
B. Adapt to changes
C. Implement based on the most up-to-date information
D. Have “fine-grained requirements” until they can become “course-grained”